702 apps — independently scored, not vendor-rated

Ditch theSaaS Tax

Every alternative gets three independent scores — repo health, technical quality, dependency risk — not a vendor's pitch or a star count.

Free & Open Source
Personally Vetted
Hand-curated
702
Apps
3,103
Packages
237
SaaS

Three independent scores

Every app and package scored the same way — deterministic, disclosed, and repeatable.

01

Repo Health

Deterministic, pulled straight from GitHub — activity, maintenance, community, maturity, momentum. No opinions, just data.

02

Technical Score

A second, independent read — architecture, code quality, innovation, how hard it is to learn. Scored separately, so one bad metric can't hide behind the other.

03

Dependency Health

What the app depends on gets scored too — staleness, footprint, known vulnerabilities via OSV.dev. An app inherits every dependency's risk.

The Collection

The dataset behind every score on this site — real numbers, disclosed methodology, updated continuously.

View Insights
14.4M
GitHub Stars
155.8K
Contributors
702
Curated Apps
237
SaaS Replaced

Latest Research · July 1, 2026

What Makes Open Source Acquirable: Lessons from 149 YC Companies

Standalone apps get acquired roughly seven times more often than libraries. Stars barely matter. And the first three weeks after the deal predict the outcome better than anything in the press release.

149
YC companies reviewed
28
verified acquisitions
3
weeks to know the outcome
Read the report8 min read
All research reports →

Join founders buildingwith open source

Opinionated takes, migration guides, cost-saving tips, and insights from the open source ecosystem.

Subscribe on Substack
Join 750+ subscribers

Search